Tom Robert's ill-conceived notion of electron acceleration.

[g***@hotmail.com]

In cicurlar orbit, Vx increased and Vy decreases or vice-versa.

V increase = photon absorption
V decrease = photon emission

Vincrease + Vdecrease = nil net effect

[g***@hotmail.com]

On Jun 3, 2:33 pm, Eric Gisse <***@gmail.com> wrote:

You never read what is written lame brain.

To deny what I wrote, you will have to argue that particles do not get
momentarily scattered in the ring along the defocusing planes of the Q
& D plane (THE NET EFFECT ONLY IS A FOCUSED BEAM).

If the beam's energy (particle mass or velocity) is too high they even
need SEXTUPOLES instead of quadrupoles.


Dead BRAIN GISSE HEAD can't figure out that:

...this will cause EM radiation since scattered particles cannot be
perfectly orthogonal to the magnets.

---------------------------

Don't argue with me, argue with yourself retard and:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrupole_magnet
qutoe: "The net result of these fields is a focusing force in one
plane and a defocusing one in the plane perpendicular to it."

[No One]

Post by g***@hotmail.com
You never read what is written lame brain.
To deny what I wrote, you will have to argue that particles do not
get momentarily scattered in the ring along the defocusing planes
of the Q & D plane (THE NET EFFECT ONLY IS A FOCUSED BEAM).
If the beam's energy (particle mass or velocity) is too high they
even need SEXTUPOLES instead of quadrupoles.
...this will cause EM radiation since scattered particles cannot
be perfectly orthogonal to the magnets.
---------------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrupole_magnet
qutoe: "The net result of these fields is a focusing force in one
plane and a defocusing one in the plane perpendicular to it."

How many times are you going to let Eric Gisse <***@gmail.com>
change the followup group to alt.morons before you get a clue?