Discussion:
Fuel Savings from Roadbed Electrification Pays for thePowerPlant In ?14 Months
(too old to reply)
Eeyore
2009-05-31 00:11:00 UTC
Permalink
Androcles wrote:

Stuff your playing with follow-ups.

YOU'RE THE MORON.

It just goes to show you can't counter a valid argument other than by being a
total prick.
Marvin the Martian
2009-05-31 03:00:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Eeyore
Stuff your playing with follow-ups.
YOU'RE THE MORON.
It just goes to show you can't counter a valid argument other than by
being a total prick.
Actually, while my understanding is that rail is cheap and truck
transportation is expensive, I agree that playing with the follow ups is
childish, an attempt to waste bandwidth and time, and I suggest that
Androcles be killfiled.

If he doesn't want to hear the answers, we shouldn't have to listen to
him.
--
Flamer & Trolls happily killfiled, as they should. No one should have to
tolerate their abuse. If a flamer should get luck and ask an intelligent
question and you want it answered, repeat it for them.
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2009-05-31 05:30:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Marvin the Martian
Post by Eeyore
Stuff your playing with follow-ups.
YOU'RE THE MORON.
It just goes to show you can't counter a valid argument other than by
being a total prick.
Actually, while my understanding is that rail is cheap and truck
transportation is expensive, I agree that playing with the follow ups is
childish, an attempt to waste bandwidth and time, and I suggest that
Androcles be killfiled.
It highly depends on what is being transported.

Heavy, bulk cargo is cheaper by rail, most everything else isn't or
people would be using rail.
--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
Loading...