Discussion:
Speed of light relative to what?
(too old to reply)
Henry Wilson DSc
2010-09-21 00:28:08 UTC
Permalink
Even YOU should accept that the wavelength of a light signal cannot be
affected
by observer movement.
But it is .. experiment has shown that.
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE: No intrinsic property of anything can be affected by
the
movement of an observer.
It isn't affected in SR, you moron.
Good if any two presynched clocks are 'unaffected' they will remain in synch.
How many times are you told the same
thing over and over and you just WON'T LEARN !!!! You've a poor excuse for
a brain
You seem to use you poor brain AS an excuse.

Henry Wilson...

.......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
BURT
2010-09-23 03:04:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henry Wilson DSc
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE: No intrinsic property of anything can be affected by
the
movement of an observer.
It isn't affected in SR, you moron.  
Good if any two presynched clocks are 'unaffected' they will remain in synch.
'Synch' is not an intrinsic property of either of the clocks, moron.
And unless they are at exactly the same location, it isn't an
intrinsic property of the system comprising the two clocks either,
moron
The speed of light is a constant through time distance.

Mitch Raemsch
Henry Wilson DSc
2010-09-23 03:49:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Henry Wilson DSc
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE: No intrinsic property of anything can be affected by
the
movement of an observer.
It isn't affected in SR, you moron.  
Good if any two presynched clocks are 'unaffected' they will remain in synch.
'Synch' is not an intrinsic property of either of the clocks, moron.
And unless they are at exactly the same location, it isn't an
intrinsic property of the system comprising the two clocks either,
moron
Is that the best you can do, shithead?


Henry Wilson...

.......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...