Discussion:
Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
(too old to reply)
g***@hotmail.com
2007-04-13 11:56:16 UTC
Permalink
It might be stupid
[...]
Saying a Guskz idea "might" be stupid is like saying the Earth "might"
be round.
Dimensional analysis shreds your multiple paragraphs of stupidity.
Frequency = 1/time, velocity = distance/time.
Smart Grade 12 Diploma, Frequency = 1 /seconds ONLY ....and what does
the wavelength = in terms of frequency? hmmm ya never heard of it
measured in terms of meters Johnny come late...ly.
Phineas T Puddleduck
2007-04-13 12:00:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by g***@hotmail.com
It might be stupid
[...]
Saying a Guskz idea "might" be stupid is like saying the Earth "might"
be round.
Dimensional analysis shreds your multiple paragraphs of stupidity.
Frequency = 1/time, velocity = distance/time.
Smart Grade 12 Diploma, Frequency = 1 /seconds ONLY ....and what does
the wavelength = in terms of frequency? hmmm ya never heard of it
measured in terms of meters Johnny come late...ly.
Frequency DIMENSIONALLY = T^-1 idiot..... Obviously you've never done
any dimensional analysis of your own work...


Wow, guskz - you're an idiot. And you are quite capable of broadcasting
that to the world too.
--
Got mail? I did ;-) Three and counting.
Got proof? Not yet, still waiting.
g***@hotmail.com
2007-04-14 16:33:46 UTC
Permalink
It might be stupid
[...]
Saying a Guskz idea "might" be stupid is like saying the Earth "might"
be round.
Dimensional analysis shreds your multiple paragraphs of stupidity.
Frequency = 1/time, velocity = distance/time.
Thus F = v/d ....F_max = c / d_smallest

d_smallest = ????

Must be related to quanta which is the smallest quantity, as well as
permittivity and permeability of space...so by knowing the d_smallest
we would then know F_max (highest possible frequency in space)??? (for
some reason I doubt it's infinite...is this already known or not?)
Loading...