GPS & Relativity

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard" napisał w wiadomości grup

Uşytkownik "Sam Wormley" napisał w wiadomości grup
http://flipformation.com/v/Physics/relativity/video/5068/GPS-amp;-Relat
ivity
Not worthy time to look, for sure, just tell me, did they noticed,
that clocks on the GPS satellites are almost perfectly synchronized
with Earth's clock, so their real indications are described with
equation "t'=t"? Yes or no?

|They are only synchronised because

A logic of an idiot relativist: if he can explain the fact, then
there is no fact. Not quite. No matter, why and how they are
synchronized, they are synchronized, so their indications are
described with "t'=t".
Welcome to real, poor idiot.


|of the GR predicted adjustments

Bull shit. GR does not predict any adjustments. By Your idiotic
theory a Cs clock will work correctly with no adjustments in
any circumstances (tempareature and other errors are ignorable).

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard" napisał w wiadomości grup

Not worthy time to look, for sure, just tell me, did they noticed,
that clocks on the GPS satellites are almost perfectly synchronized
with Earth's clock, so their real indications are described with
equation "t'=t"? Yes or no?

|They are only synchronised because of the GR predicted adjustments in the
|rate for each satellite's clock, moron. So no, t' <> t at all.

Let's see.
Let t - indication of clock "mother" placed on Earth, and t' - indication of
a clock on one of the GPS satellites.
t=0:00:00:0000000000000000. What is t', my dear relativists?

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard" napisał w wiadomości grup
dyskusyjnych:***@217.119.49.38...


|Nonsense .. I'm not the one in denial of reality, moron.

Yes, moron, You are.

Post by Maciej Woźniak
Not quite. No matter, why and how they are
synchronized, they are synchronized, so their indications are
described with "t'=t".

|Nope. You don't know what those symbols mean.

t means indication of one clock, t' indication of another
clock, moron. Of course, seen a relativist, that claimed,
that what a clock is indicating, is not indication.

Post by Maciej Woźniak
GR does not predict any adjustments.

|Of coruse it does, moron.

So, tell me, moron, when - by GR - Cs clock should
be corrected?

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard" napisał w wiadomości grup

Post by Maciej Woźniak
Użytkownik "Wizard" napisał w wiadomości grup
|Nonsense .. I'm not the one in denial of reality, moron.
Yes, moron, You are.

|Fuck off

Nope.

Post by Maciej Woźniak

Post by Maciej Woźniak
Not quite. No matter, why and how they are
synchronized, they are synchronized, so their indications are
described with "t'=t".

|Nope. You don't know what those symbols mean.
t means indication of one clock, t' indication of another
clock, moron.

|Nope

It is written in all relativistic sources.
Probably You will soon tell me this is a "metaphor",
like this idiot Hitlong?

Post by Maciej Woźniak
So, tell me, moron, when - by GR - Cs clock should
be corrected?

|Whenever you want to.

And when - by GR - I want to correct a Cs clock, moron?

|The GR predicted effects are real.

So, t - indication of earth clock is 0:00:00:000000000.
What is t' (indication of the clock on GPS satellite)?

|issues is that they NEED to be corrected by the ammounts that GR predicts
|because GR predicts what actually happens.

Have You never heard, that Your idiotic theory predicts
clocks to unsynchronize, moron? By it, they don't NEED
to be corrected. They are to remain unsynchronized,
moron.

Your demial of that is denial of reality. Typical of moron
crackpots like You

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard-Of-Oz" napisał w wiadomości grup

Post by Maciej Woźniak

Post by Maciej Woźniak

Post by Maciej Woźniak
Not quite. No matter, why and how they are
synchronized, they are synchronized, so their indications are
described with "t'=t".

|Nope. You don't know what those symbols mean.
t means indication of one clock, t' indication of another
clock, moron.

|Nope
It is written in all relativistic sources.

|Bullshit

Read some.

Post by Maciej Woźniak

Post by Maciej Woźniak
So, tell me, moron, when - by GR - Cs clock should
be corrected?

|Whenever you want to.
And when - by GR - I want to correct a Cs clock, moron?

|I just told you, fuck face .. can't hou fucking read?

No, You didn't, fuck face, but as You can't fucking
read, You can't know, what I'm asking.

Post by Maciej Woźniak
|The GR predicted effects are real.
So, t - indication of earth clock is 0:00:00:000000000.
What is t' (indication of the clock on GPS satellite)?

|t' is not the time on the clock on the satellite.

Yes, it is.

Post by Maciej Woźniak
|issues is that they NEED to be corrected by the ammounts that GR predicts
|because GR predicts what actually happens.
Have You never heard, that Your idiotic theory predicts
clocks to unsynchronize, moron?

|And they are ... unless corrected to account for what GR predicts.
|My god but yiou're a fucking stupid little illiterate cunt

GR predicts no correction and unsynchronized clocks.
My god but yiou're a fucking stupid little illiterate cunt

Post by Maciej Woźniak
By it, they don't NEED
to be corrected.

|Of course they fucking do .. You are such a fucking imbecile

Of course they fucking do. But not by Your idiotic theory.
Your theory claim they re perfect, they should unsynchronize
and indicate this time dilation shit.
And You are such a fucking imbecile. As expected from a
relativist.

Of course they fucking do .. You are such a fucking imbecile

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard-Of-Oz" napisał w wiadomości grup

Post by Maciej Woźniak

Post by Maciej Woźniak

Post by Maciej Woźniak

Post by Maciej Woźniak
Not quite. No matter, why and how they are
synchronized, they are synchronized, so their indications are
described with "t'=t".

|Nope. You don't know what those symbols mean.
t means indication of one clock, t' indication of another
clock, moron.

|Nope
It is written in all relativistic sources.

|Bullshit
Read some.

Post by Maciej Woźniak

Post by Maciej Woźniak
So, tell me, moron, when - by GR - Cs clock should
be corrected?

|Whenever you want to.
And when - by GR - I want to correct a Cs clock, moron?

|I just told you, fuck face .. can't hou fucking read?
No, You didn't, fuck face, but as You can't fucking
read, You can't know, what I'm asking.

Post by Maciej Woźniak
|The GR predicted effects are real.
So, t - indication of earth clock is 0:00:00:000000000.
What is t' (indication of the clock on GPS satellite)?

|t' is not the time on the clock on the satellite.
Yes, it is.

Post by Maciej Woźniak
|issues is that they NEED to be corrected by the ammounts that GR predicts
|because GR predicts what actually happens.
Have You never heard, that Your idiotic theory predicts
clocks to unsynchronize, moron?

|And they are ... unless corrected to account for what GR predicts.
|My god but yiou're a fucking stupid little illiterate cunt
GR predicts no correction and unsynchronized clocks.

|Stop your stupid lies .. they just show that you're a liar and stupid.

Stop your stupid lies .. they just show that you're a liar and stupid.

Post by Maciej Woźniak
My god but yiou're a fucking stupid little illiterate cunt

Post by Maciej Woźniak
By it, they don't NEED
to be corrected.

|Of course they fucking do .. You are such a fucking imbecile
Of course they fucking do.

|So you lied

Stop your stupid lies .. they just show that you're a liar and stupid.

Post by Maciej Woźniak
But not by Your idiotic theory.

|Its not by theory

Yes, it's not by theory, but by practic. Your idiotic theory claims,
they' re perfect, don't need any corrections and should unsynchronize.


|, its that of physics, and is verified experimentally
|and by observations, including those of the GPS.

It's verified, i agree - as a brainwashing total bullshit.

Post by Maciej Woźniak
Your theory claim they re perfect,

|No, it doesn't make any such clain

Yes, it does make such claim.

Post by Maciej Woźniak
they should unsynchronize

|Of course they should

Of course they should, and they don't.

Post by Maciej Woźniak
and indicate this time dilation shit.

|which is what happens .. and why you are such a moron for denying it.

No, it's not. Clocks indicate t'... and why you are such a moron for denying
it.

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard-Of-Oz" napisał w wiadomości grup
dyskusyjnych:***@217.119.49.38...

|FUCK OFF, moron. You haven't the intelligence to even write your own
|sentences, let alone ask a sensible question nor understand the correct
|and valid answer given to you. You are doomed to be a willfully
|ignorant and moronic little cunt for life. How sad for you. Now .. if
|you can understand: FUCK OFF

FUCK OFF, moron. You haven't the intelligence to even write your own
sentences, let alone understand a sensible question nor give the correct
and valid answer. You are doomed to be a willfully ignorant and moronic
little cunt for life. How sad for you. Now .. if you can understand: FUCK
OFF

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard" napisał w wiadomości grup

Post by Maciej Woźniak
Użytkownik "Wizard" napisał w wiadomości grup

Not worthy time to look, for sure, just tell me, did they noticed,
that clocks on the GPS satellites are almost perfectly synchronized
with Earth's clock, so their real indications are described with
equation "t'=t"? Yes or no?

|They are only synchronised because of the GR predicted adjustments in
the
|rate for each satellite's clock, moron. So no, t' <> t at all.
Let's see.
Let t - indication of clock "mother" placed on Earth, and t' -
indication of a clock on one of the GPS satellites.
t=0:00:00:0000000000000000. What is t', my dear relativists?

|Not what those symbols mean in physics ..

I asked, what is t', moron? Well, if You want and You
can, give me value of t' by Your "meaning". VALUE.
Some NUMBERS, instead of a piece-of-shit symbollic
formula. Can You?

Anyway, of course, You are lying. All physical sources agree -
t is indication of one clock, t' is indication of another.
Well, either You're lying or You don't know whot those
symbols mean in physics. Both this things are possible.
And for sure You don't know the definition of time
proposed by Your guru, Einstein.

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard-Of-Oz" napisał w wiadomości grup

Post by Maciej Woźniak

Post by Maciej Woźniak
Let's see.
Let t - indication of clock "mother" placed on Earth, and t' -
indication of a clock on one of the GPS satellites.
t=0:00:00:0000000000000000. What is t', my dear relativists?

|Not what those symbols mean in physics ..
I asked, what is t', moron?

|YOu don't know? .. not a surprise

I know, little cunt, but You surely don't.

Post by Maciej Woźniak
Well, if You want and You
can, give me value of t' by Your "meaning". VALUE.
Some NUMBERS, instead of a piece-of-shit symbollic
formula. Can You?

|Fuck off .. I'm not doing your homework for you

You'd have to know something, beside how to lie
and how to insult.

Post by Maciej Woźniak
All physical sources agree -
t is indication of one clock, t' is indication of another.

|Bullshit

Read some of them, moron.

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard-Of-Oz" napisał w wiadomości grup

Post by Maciej Woźniak
|Bullshit
Read some of them, moron.

|I've already read some bullshit .. all yours.

So read some relativistic papers too, moron.

|Now fuck off and learn some physics instead of making a fool of yourself
|fuck-face.

Now fuck off and learn some physics instead of making a fool of yourself
fuck-face.

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard-Of-Oz" napisał w wiadomości grup

Użytkownik "Maciej Woźniak" napisał w wiadomości grup
Użytkownik "Wizard" napisał w wiadomości grup

Not worthy time to look, for sure, just tell me, did they noticed,
that clocks on the GPS satellites are almost perfectly synchronized
with Earth's clock, so their real indications are described with
equation "t'=t"? Yes or no?

|They are only synchronised because of the GR predicted adjustments in
the
|rate for each satellite's clock, moron. So no, t' <> t at all.
Let's see.
Let t - indication of clock "mother" placed on Earth, and t' -
indication of a clock on one of the GPS satellites.
t=0:00:00:0000000000000000. What is t', my dear relativists?

|FUCK OFF .. you're too ignorant to ask a sensible question, let alone
|understand the sensible and correct answers I already gave you. The only
|thing you deserve is to be told to FUCK OFF. But you're too fucking stupid
|to even do that. Your persistent and willful ignorance is pathethic.

FUCK OFF .. you're too ignorant to understand a sensible question, let alone
give the sensible and correct answers The only
thing you deserve is to be told to FUCK OFF. But you're too fucking stupid
to even do that. Your persistent and willful ignorance is pathethic.

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard-Of-Oz" napisał w wiadomości grup
dyskusyjnych:***@217.119.49.38...


|You just proved my point, moron. Gees you're a fucking idiot

For a fucking idiot everything always proves his point.

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard-Of-Oz" napisał w wiadomości grup

Post by Maciej Woźniak

Post by Maciej Woźniak
FUCK OFF .. you're too ignorant to understand a sensible question, let
alone give the sensible and correct answers The only thing you
deserve is to be told to FUCK OFF. But you're too fucking stupid to
even do that. Your persistent and willful ignorance is pathethic.

You just proved my point, moron. Gees you're a fucking idiot

Then be a man and answer the question. Do not evade or thin out the
information.
Do you imply that the GPS clock rates are changed?
Till you answer this question, you remain wood!

|I already answered, and didn't just imply but stated that.

So maybe repeat, poor idiot. What is t'? Value please. Can
be value by Your meaning if You have one.

[Maciej Woźniak]

Użytkownik "Wizard-Of-Oz" napisał w wiadomości grup

Post by Maciej Woźniak

Not worthy time to look, for sure, just tell me, did they noticed,
that clocks on the GPS satellites are almost perfectly synchronized
with Earth's clock, so their real indications are described with
equation "t'=t"? Yes or no?

|They are only synchronised because of the GR predicted adjustments in
the
|rate for each satellite's clock, moron. So no, t' <> t at all.
Let's see.
Let t - indication of clock "mother" placed on Earth, and t' -
indication of a clock on one of the GPS satellites.
t=01.01.2014 0:00:00:0000000000000000. What is t', my dear
relativists?

|You've had your answer .. stop asking

You're to stupid to notice it Yourself, but I
assure You answer in this case is a NUMBER. Or, some
numbers.
No, i don't have it.