arrogant top sciencists

[Shubee]

If a Meson decays, it will break into two identical Photons that fly
apart in opposite directions.
According to Action at a Distance, if one measures the polarity of one
of these Photons, then this simulteneously determines the polarity of
the other Photon.
Is this not a case of SIMULTANETY ?

More precisely, it's a case where a confused and largely misunderstood
concept in quantum mechanics is applied correctly to reach an
unwarranted conclusion. Permit me to illustrate.
Physicist A, when seen in public, is known to always wear a blue sock
and a red sock. It's a law of physics. In the middle of that
physicist's mathematically inept lecture on "quantum action-at-a-
distance," student B turns off all the lights. Then students C and D
knock the professor down and remove his shoes and steal his socks.
There, in the dark, student F, who has two large indistinguishable
envelopes, takes the two socks and places each one in an envelope and
then seals the envelopes. Student F then mails these envelopes to
widely distant locations. The first recipient to open the package will
discover either a blue sock or a red sock. That automatically
determines that the sock in the other distant package will
automatically have the opposite color property. It's not exactly
spooky physics or "wall of weird" material.

Thank you for describing precisely the result that would satisfy
Bell's inequality. Unfortunately, experiments agree with the quantum
mechanical prediction that Bell's inequality is violated. Perhaps you
should learn enough math to work through an introductory quantum
mechanics textbook.

You do not have a correct understanding of quantum mechanics and have
been duped by an occult pseudo-scientific interpretation, which
teaches that physical properties don't exist until they are measured.
Your strong religious belief that it has been experimentally verified
that the moon doesn't exist if no one is looking at it, for example,
is false.

Shubee
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf

[Shubee]

If a Meson decays, it will break into two identical Photons that fly
apart in opposite directions.
According to Action at a Distance, if one measures the polarity of one
of these Photons, then this simulteneously determines the polarity of
the other Photon.
Is this not a case of SIMULTANETY ?

More precisely, it's a case where a confused and largely misunderstood
concept in quantum mechanics is applied correctly to reach an
unwarranted conclusion. Permit me to illustrate.
Physicist A, when seen in public, is known to always wear a blue sock
and a red sock. It's a law of physics. In the middle of that
physicist's mathematically inept lecture on "quantum action-at-a-
distance," student B turns off all the lights. Then students C and D
knock the professor down and remove his shoes and steal his socks.
There, in the dark, student F, who has two large indistinguishable
envelopes, takes the two socks and places each one in an envelope and
then seals the envelopes. Student F then mails these envelopes to
widely distant locations. The first recipient to open the package will
discover either a blue sock or a red sock. That automatically
determines that the sock in the other distant package will
automatically have the opposite color property. It's not exactly
spooky physics or "wall of weird" material.

Thank you for describing precisely the result that would satisfy
Bell's inequality. Unfortunately, experiments agree with the quantum
mechanical prediction that Bell's inequality is violated. Perhaps you
should learn enough math to work through an introductory quantum
mechanics textbook.

You do not have a correct understanding of quantum mechanics and have
been duped by an occult pseudo-scientific interpretation, which
teaches that physical properties don't exist until they are measured.
Your strong religious belief that it has been experimentally verified
that the moon doesn't exist if no one is looking at it, for example,
is false.

Shubee
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf