Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces

[g***@hotmail.com]

Perspective is part of Relativity, does the examples below demonstrate
#1 (F = qvXB, if v=0 then F=0) A magnetic deflection is seen on one
moving plane versus it is seen as no magnetic deflection on a static
plane.
#2. And for a Coriolis Force, generates a curved deflection observed
on one rotating plane where as it is seen as a straight deflection
from a static plane.

Interesting observation, I'd agree with it.

That's because you never studied any actual physics.
The Coriolis effect arises from studying how a rotating system behaves
with respect to a stationary system. However, the Lorentz force isn't
anything like the Coriolis force.

And they say Erica isn't intelligent, notice the girl did use the
comparison given to contradict, only what's stored inside her hollow
tube head.
Fc = -2wm X V
Fm = qv X V
Why these aren't the exact same equation, therefore Missis Erica
conludes they are not the same.

When you are capable of deriving either of them we can have this
discussion.-

I don't discuss with women that don't use the comparison given to
them, hollow brains are easy in the sack.

Oh look, a stupid person with stupid opinions. Imagine that

I don't discuss with women that don't use the comparison given to
them, hollow brains are easy in the sack.

[g***@hotmail.com]

Perspective is part of Relativity, does the examples below demonstrate
#1 (F = qvXB, if v=0 then F=0) A magnetic deflection is seen on one
moving plane versus it is seen as no magnetic deflection on a static
plane.
#2. And for a Coriolis Force, generates a curved deflection observed
on one rotating plane where as it is seen as a straight deflection
from a static plane.

Interesting observation, I'd agree with it.

That's because you never studied any actual physics.
The Coriolis effect arises from studying how a rotating system behaves
with respect to a stationary system. However, the Lorentz force isn't
anything like the Coriolis force.

And they say Erica isn't intelligent, notice the girl did use the
comparison given to contradict, only what's stored inside her hollow
tube head.
Fc = -2wm X V
Fm = qv X V
Why these aren't the exact same equation, therefore Missis Erica
conludes they are not the same.

When you are capable of deriving either of them we can have this
discussion.-

I don't discuss with women that don't use the comparison given to
them, hollow brains are easy in the sack.

Oh look, a stupid person with stupid opinions. Imagine that...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

I don't discuss with women that don't use the comparison given to
them, hollow brains are easy in the sack.

[geotek]

Perspective is part of Relativity, does the examples below
demonstrate
#1 (F = qvXB, if v=0 then F=0) A magnetic deflection is seen
on one
moving plane versus it is seen as no magnetic deflection on a
static
plane.
#2. And for a Coriolis Force, generates a curved deflection
observed
on one rotating plane where as it is seen as a straight
deflection
from a static plane.

Interesting observation, I'd agree with it.

That's because you never studied any actual physics.
The Coriolis effect arises from studying how a rotating system behaves
with respect to a stationary system. However, the Lorentz force isn't
anything like the Coriolis force.

And they say Erica isn't intelligent, notice the girl did use the
comparison given to contradict, only what's stored inside her hollow
tube head.
Fc = -2wm X V
Fm = qv X V
Why these aren't the exact same equation, therefore Missis Erica
conludes they are not the same.

When you are capable of deriving either of them we can have this
discussion.-

I don't discuss with women that don't use the comparison given to
them, hollow brains are easy in the sack.

Oh look, a stupid person with stupid opinions. Imagine that...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

I don't discuss with women that don't use the comparison given to
them, hollow brains are easy in the sack.

Apparently, you belong here.