Discussion:
Galilean transformation equations
(too old to reply)
rbwinn
2009-01-07 03:58:44 UTC
Permalink
[snip]
Please just ignore bobby, all he wants is to suck people into
explaining to him why he is wrong. He's done it for a decade, and he
will do it for another decade.
And bobby, can you resist responding? Or will you dance like the
puppet you are?
Thank you for sharing, Eric.
Robert B. Winn
DANCE, PUPPET
Your math does not seem very accurate, Eric. If something is over, it
does not continue. Maybe you had another length contraction for
things that are over.
Robert B. Winn
rbwinn
2009-02-21 14:43:48 UTC
Permalink
x'=x-vt
y'=y
z'=z
t'=t
Robert B. Winn
The GT might be extend to the fourth spatial dimension
w'=w
Then LT == GT.
Well, if w is velocity of light, I suppose so, but the correct
velocity is given by the Galilean transformation equations, not by the
Lorentz equations.  The Lorentz equations change the direction by
sending the light through an oblate spheroid instead of through a
sphere.
Robert B. Winn
w is the 4-th _spatial_ dimension here, not a velocity.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Oh, well I use it for velocity of light.
Robert B. Winn
I try to explain my point of view.
Explaining it is pointless, he doesn't care a bout anything other than
dragging you into repeated explanations.
[snip rest]- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Thank you for sharing, Eric.
Robert B. Winn
You can't let one thing in here go without a response, even if it is
the typical pointless shit like "thank you for sharing". Cue followup
pointless response "profanity is an attempt..."
Dance, puppet.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Thank you for sharing, Eric.
Robert B. Winn

Loading...