When are Unifuckactionists Going to Realise That Wilson was Wrong?

[Henry Wilson, DSc]

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:42:51 +0100, "Androcles"

Maybe Xrays travel at different speeds.
Maybe Algol is an eclipsing binary like I have said in the past.

Maybe Wilson is a fuckin' turncoat.

Whether you approve or not, there ARE genuine eclipsing binaries out
there.

In that case the light should cut off and reappear sharply.

Since it doesn't, Algol is not eclipsing. Maybe Wilson is a fuckin' idiot.

Henry Wilson...www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

........the broad picture specialist.

[Henry Wilson, DSc]

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:42:51 +0100, "Androcles"

Maybe Xrays travel at different speeds.
Maybe Algol is an eclipsing binary like I have said in the past.

Maybe Wilson is a fuckin' turncoat.

Whether you approve or not, there ARE genuine eclipsing binaries out
there.

In that case the light should cut off and reappear sharply.
http://youtu.be/b82s74UV6KQ

That's a total eclipse.

Since it doesn't, Algol is not eclipsing. Maybe Wilson is a fuckin' idiot.

Maybe Androcles is a silly old pom. Most eclipses are partial.

I'm not saying that Algol is or isn't eclipsing. I don't have the required
info.
But MY predicted light curve is the same as yours.

Henry Wilson...www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

........the broad picture specialist.