Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.

[Golden Boar]

[snip]

http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/GuestAppearance.html
Did you have a look at it?
Dirk Vdm

Yes, I have looked at it, and it does not answer the question.

I only had a hit from Androcles' IP-address.
Can you explain that?
Dirk Vdm

Quite easily.
You are simply mistaken.
I have a visied your site a couple of times today, and have just
visited it agian at 18:16 GMT.
So either your websites logging system is crap or you don't know that
much about networking. I'm betting on the latter.

No, I have another explanation.
Either you haven't visited it which means you are a liar,
or you are Androcles, which means you are a liar.
Caught with your pants down.

You still can't answer the question though can you?

You can't figure out the answer from the explanation that
you didn't even look at.

Quite hilraious.

Hilariously pitiful, indeed, imbecile.
Dirk Vdm

I have visited the site and I am not Androcles.
If your logs do not show a hit for 18:16 GMT, then your websites
logging system is crap.
If it does show a hit for that time, then post the IP address you are
referring to, and I will show you that you don't know what you're
talking about.
You have repeatedly avoided answering the simple question, because you
know that the answer will show that I have benn right all along.

You are an imbecile for not understanding or even trying
to understand the spoonfed information you received, and
for being caught in the act of lying, and there is nothing you
can do about it :-)
Dirk Vdm

I asked you to provide the IP address and I would prove this.
You did not provide the IP address, why was that?

Here are some clues.
Both of are ISP's are Telewest.
I am posting from Liverpool
Androcles is posting from Gillingham.

I have visited your website and I am not Androcles.
You are a blatant lier and a fool.

And you still havn't answered the simple question.

[Golden Boar]

[snip]

http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/GuestAppearance.html
Did you have a look at it?
Dirk Vdm

Yes, I have looked at it, and it does not answer the question.

I only had a hit from Androcles' IP-address.
Can you explain that?
Dirk Vdm

Quite easily.
You are simply mistaken.
I have a visied your site a couple of times today, and have just
visited it agian at 18:16 GMT.
So either your websites logging system is crap or you don't know that
much about networking. I'm betting on the latter.

No, I have another explanation.
Either you haven't visited it which means you are a liar,
or you are Androcles, which means you are a liar.
Caught with your pants down.

You still can't answer the question though can you?

You can't figure out the answer from the explanation that
you didn't even look at.

Quite hilraious.

Hilariously pitiful, indeed, imbecile.
Dirk Vdm

I have visited the site and I am not Androcles.
If your logs do not show a hit for 18:16 GMT, then your websites
logging system is crap.
If it does show a hit for that time, then post the IP address you are
referring to, and I will show you that you don't know what you're
talking about.
You have repeatedly avoided answering the simple question, because you
know that the answer will show that I have benn right all along.

You are an imbecile for not understanding or even trying
to understand the spoonfed information you received, and
for being caught in the act of lying, and there is nothing you
can do about it :-)
Dirk Vdm

I now know why you think that I did not visit your site. It is because
I block third party cookies.

[Golden Boar]

[...]

The reason why you believe that I did not visit your site is because I
block third party cookies.

Fascinating. You are ignorant in computing as well as physics.

LOL, I guarantee you that I know more about computers than you ever
will. I have over 20 years experience of working with computers,
including programming, building PC's, maintenance, software and
hardware installations, network installations, network security, and
more recently, consultancy.
In another thread, I noticed someone complaining because he got a
cookie when he visited Dirk's site, and Dirk posted the pollowing link
in response.
http://www.statcounter.com/privacy.html
A quote from that page,
"To enable StatCounter.com to track your unique visitors we send a

and 'unique visitors' is underlined in that text for a reason ;-)
See http://www.statcounter.com/unique_visitor.html
This is completely independent of the IP-logging.

cookie to your visitors' computer. This information is collected solely
to improve the service we offer to you and statistical purposes and is
not used to identify individuals."
Since I have Firefox set up to reject third party cookies, StatCounter
would not be able to track me.

Even if you refuse cookies, your IP is still logged.
You seem to be quite ignorant about this, and you are a
blatant liar as well ;-)
Dirk Vdm

If I havn't visited you site, then how come I am able to post the
source code for your page?
<html>
<head>
<title>Immortal Fumble Golden Boar (Androcles Clone): Perhaps you
should make a guest appearance</title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFF4E8" lang="EN-US" style="font-family: Verdana;
font-size:9pt" alink="#FF0000">
<div align="center">
<h3 style="color:darkred">An immortal fumble by <u>Golden Boar
(Androcles Clone)</u> (7-Oct-2006)</h3>
<h5 style="color:blue"><b><i><u>Perhaps you should make a guest
appearance</u></i></b></h5>
<div>
<table border="1" style="font-family: Verdana; font-size:9pt">
<tr>
<td colspan="2" bgcolor="White">
<pre style="font-family: Courier New; font-size:10pt; padding: 1em"

<b>

...
I think that should be enough to convinve everyone that you are a
blatant lier.

Now I have a few hits.
Well done ;-)
Dirk Vdm

Your'e a blatant lier Dirk.
<!-- Start of StatCounter Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
var sc_project=1141211;
var sc_invisible=1;
var sc_partition=10;
var sc_security="fa99ac55";
var sc_https=1;
var sc_remove_link=1;
</script>
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"
src="https://secure.statcounter.com/counter/frames.js"></script><noscript><img
src="https://c11.statcounter.com/counter.php?sc_project=1141211&amp;java=0&amp;security=fa99ac55&amp;invisible=1"
alt="invisible hit counter" border="0"> </noscript>
<!-- End of StatCounter Code -->
I have Firefox setup to block scripts.
Caught in the act again Dirk, you are a terrible lier.

You don't have to execute scripts to have your IP-adress
known, imbecile. I can block everything and I still get a hit
on the counter.

If that is the case then why did you only accept that I had visited
your website, once I posted the source code.

Because I got a hit before you posted the code - as you perfectly know.

How convenient.
If you did get a hit, then you got a couple of hits yesterday as well.
I even posted the time at which I visited your site. Why would I do
that and not visit your site?
Anyone with any sense, can tell that you're lying.

Either, my IP address was logged yesterday, which makes you a lier, or
it has not been logged at all, which makes you a lier.
Either way, your a blatant lier.
Come on Dirky, show us your logs, show us your logs...

Squeal and squirm ;-)

...show us your logs, show us your logs...

But anyway, now that you finally did have that look at the
explanation, what have you learned form it?
Nothing?
Excellent :-)

Same thing that I learnt yesterday, you're a blatant lying moron.

Dirk Vdm

Given that c=1, v=0.9, t=5, x=9, y=6, and z=3, what are the values of
vx, vy and vz?

:-) Loading Image...
Dirk Vdm

vx = v x / s

If I am wrong then prove it. This is the last time I will ask, as I am
getting boored of your silly games. It makes no difference to me, the
equations I posted originally are fine.