Discussion:
Experimental basis of Special Relativity
(too old to reply)
Henry Wilson DSc.
2013-08-31 00:24:35 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:38:54 +0000 (UTC), "Wizard-Of-Oz"
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:26:16 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen"
Quite.
Math tend to appear that way to the intellectually
less fortunate.
Yes. Please explain my maths to your idiot colleagues.
[snip same old math]
We all understand, and keep telling you as well, that change in the sum of
the KE in a system (which is what you are doing in your math) is (inertial)
frame independent. And all you do is show that over and over, and saying
we don't understand it.
* The KE for individual objects is frame dependent
* The sum of the KE for the individual objects in a system is frame
dependent
* The change in KE for individual objects is frame dependent
And that denial is despite being shown the math to support the claim.
You're just a stupid little fuck,
You're talking kindergarten crap
Henry Wilson DSc.
2013-08-31 10:23:31 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:38:54 +0000 (UTC), "Wizard-Of-Oz"
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:26:16 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen"
Quite.
Math tend to appear that way to the intellectually
less fortunate.
Yes. Please explain my maths to your idiot colleagues.
[snip same old math]
We all understand, and keep telling you as well, that change in the sum of
the KE in a system (which is what you are doing in your math) is (inertial)
frame independent. And all you do is show that over and over, and saying
we don't understand it.
* The KE for individual objects is frame dependent
* The sum of the KE for the individual objects in a system is frame
dependent
* The change in KE for individual objects is frame dependent
And that denial is despite being shown the math to support the claim.
You're just a stupid little fuck,
it's tough having to accept that you have made a fool of yourself, isn't it
diaper?...but you must be pretty used to doing that by now...

Henry Wilson DSc.

Loading...