The weighted train when begining to move

[BURT]

Relative motion is in the opposite direction of the accelerating
train.

No .. of the moving train .. it doesn't have to be accelerating

Accelerating sets it into motion.

By weight of a test mass we can meaure how much the train has
accelerated.

By how much it is accelerating, yes.  Once it has stopped accelerating and
is once more travelling at a uniform velocity, a weight won't really help
you

But you no longer need it.

We can calculate an end speed.

That's basic schoolboy physics.

Weightedness is at the
creation of motion.

Meaningless word salad.

When creating new speed there is detectability.

Relative motion is in the opposite direction. Einstein never saw that.

Opposite direction to motion (you didn't say that) .. yes .. Its been known
that way since Galileo and Newton .. of course Einstein saw it, moron

Also it shrinks in the distance. Galileo never saw that.

Because it doesn't shrink in the distance at all.

By paralax it does.

Motion is deteactable when beginning by its weight and creates an
appearence that looks like motion in the opposite direction but is
not.

Mitch Raemsch

[BURT]

Relative motion is in the opposite direction of the accelerating
train.

No .. of the moving train .. it doesn't have to be accelerating

By weight of a test mass we can meaure how much the train has
accelerated.

By how much it is accelerating, yes.  Once it has stopped accelerating and
is once more travelling at a uniform velocity, a weight won't really help
you

We can calculate an end speed.

That's basic schoolboy physics.

Weightedness is at the
creation of motion.

Meaningless word salad.

Relative motion is in the opposite direction. Einstein never saw that.

Opposite direction to motion (you didn't say that) .. yes .. Its been known
that way since Galileo and Newton .. of course Einstein saw it, moron

Also it shrinks in the distance. Galileo never saw that.

Because it doesn't shrink in the distance at all.

Weight allows detection of new motion. Relative motion is an
appearence in
the opposite direction. And there is dimensional parallax shrinking of
the appearence
of size and moton into the distance.

Mitch Raemsch