Discussion:
What's your guys' take on Moving Dimensions Theory? Vs. String Theory / LQG?
(too old to reply)
cjcountess
2009-11-10 18:24:24 UTC
Permalink
Ahmed, how are you?



To simplify things, we could translate your, "2pi square root(L/g)" to
(sqrt of c^2) which is "c" and multiply it by 2pi which is equal to
(h x 2pi). The sqrt of c^2 on the short end of the EM spectrum, would
be radius of electron.



KONCHOK.PENDAY

Sounds interesting will look at it.



Dre,

With all due respect, I am realy curious as to how and where does
"quantum theory", tell us that, photons expand sphericaly at c, which
means it gets bigger exponentialy, at LxT^2. I could see how space, as
ground state energy, as a whole does this, but a single photon? PLEASE
EXPLAIN?

And again explain gravity's apparent faster than c probagation.

I already told you that I think gravity can be quantitised in same way
as energy and matter because of inertial/gravity mass equvalence. This
I saw because of my geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2.

Like I said just as (E=mc^2) = (m=Ec^2) because of energy /mass
equvalence (m=Ec^2) = (G=mc^2) because of inertia mass/gravity mass
equvalence. Einstien even stated in article on General Relativity that
the grvity strenth of earth = rest energy of earth x c^2. And
furthermore because of geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2 it become
plain that (E=hf/c^2) = (F=mv/r^2) = (F=Gmm/r^2) and (E=mc^2) =
(F=mv^2) on quantum level exactly not just as analogies.

Conrad Countess
d***@hotmail.com
2009-11-10 20:24:59 UTC
Permalink
Ahmed, how are you?

To simplify things, we could translate your, "2pi square root(L/g)"
to
(sqrt of c^2) which is "c" and multiply it by 2pi which is equal to
(h x 2pi). The sqrt of c^2 on the short end of the EM spectrum, would
be radius of electron.


KONCHOK.PENDAY


Sounds interesting will look at it.


Dre,


With all due respect, I am realy curious as to how and where does
"quantum theory", tell us that, photons expand sphericaly at c, which
means it gets bigger exponentialy, at LxT^2. I could see how space,
as
ground state energy, as a whole does this, but a single photon?
PLEASE
EXPLAIN?


And again explain gravity's apparent faster than c probagation.


I already told you that I think gravity can be quantitised in same
way
as energy and matter because of inertial/gravity mass equvalence.
This
I saw because of my geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2.


Like I said just as (E=mc^2) = (m=Ec^2) because of energy /mass
equvalence (m=Ec^2) = (G=mc^2) because of inertia mass/gravity mass
equvalence. Einstien even stated in article on General Relativity
that
the grvity strenth of earth = rest energy of earth x c^2. And
furthermore because of geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2 it become
plain that (E=hf/c^2) = (F=mv/r^2) = (F=Gmm/r^2) and (E=mc^2) =
(F=mv^2) on quantum level exactly not just as analogies.


Conrad Countess
cjcountess
2009-11-11 18:06:16 UTC
Permalink
Thank you Androcles

I did that.

It still bothers me that someone can do what has been done. This
leaves all of our post subject to sabatage and abuse.

Conrad J Countess

Loading...