Henry Wilson DSc.
2013-12-19 09:43:05 UTC
It can't give light a two-way speed (which only requires one clock)
which it different to c. Light travels at c, regardless of the
relative motion of the source and observer. That is what experiment
shows us. And the one way speed is independent of the speed of the
source. Ballistic theories are totally refuted .. SR never has been.
oh dear. YOu're even more naive than Bodkin.which it different to c. Light travels at c, regardless of the
relative motion of the source and observer. That is what experiment
shows us. And the one way speed is independent of the speed of the
source. Ballistic theories are totally refuted .. SR never has been.
The fact that TWLS measurements produce the same value, c, for light
speed is one of the most obvious proofs of BaTh.
It refutes it.speed is one of the most obvious proofs of BaTh.
But nobody has performed a TWLS using a moving source.
They have. And verified that the one-way speed from a moving source is thesame as from a stationary one
I wonder why
not .
No you don't, you simply deny the existence of those experiments and keepnot .
posting your nonsense instead.
You're a moron
__
Henry Wilson DSc.