Discussion:
DET- DALLAS THANKSGIVING ADVANTAGE NEEDS TO GO
(too old to reply)
JK
2007-11-23 17:01:13 UTC
Permalink
As I said, the "cheating" charge was thrown around by morons to make the
whole story jucier than it actually is. Anybody who continues to use it is
equally moronic.
Rationalize away, dumbass.
--
So, obviously, you're not a big fan of rationality.
Are you so dumb as to thing rationalizing and rationality are the same
thing?

That was a rhetorical quesiton, BTW.
--
JK
2007-11-24 03:06:28 UTC
Permalink
That's not the point. The question is whether they were in to protect
their lead, or to run up the score as high as possible.
Clearly, their leads were secure. What were the odds of the Jets
pulling the game out, or NO, at those points of the games??
I'm not telling anyone not to do it. I'm just saying not to be
surprised when a pissed off backup LB takes one of your guys out.
My point is that most teams do it, and I showed you examples/
WRONG. Most teams who are protecting a lead late in the game do NOT
go for it on 4th and 5 just to run up the score. You're full of shit
and you know it.
Your assumption is wrong as to why BB went for it.
Then enlighten us. Why go for it when the game is over? There's only
one reason. To run up the score.

Classless coach. Classless QB. Classless organization, top to
bottom, fans included.
JK
2007-11-24 16:31:07 UTC
Permalink
BULLSHIT.
You seem to be an expert in BS, as you're full of it!
When you're playing against a D who hasn't stopped anything all day
and has already put half of their backups in and then have your
STARTERS go for it, there's only ONE reason for that, and that's to
insult the other team.
Who did that? Which starters did the Bills pull? You have to lay off
the hooch and crack.
You're a big time idiot if you believe that crap you just said.
You're a moron. JK = Just Kidding, right? So, once again, should
they just take a knee or kick the gratuitous FG.
It would not have been gratuitous to kick the FG. Especially since,
obviously, in those situations the defense was trying to HOLD them to
a FG. Instead they go play action and shoot for the endzone, then
celebrate Martin Grammatica after an extra point.

THAT is gratuitous.
JK
2007-11-24 18:54:46 UTC
Permalink
Baloney. You're as full of shit as your cheating coach.
Why don't you and the eight voices in your head, get a clue, before
you post you asinine opinions.
Him being a cheater is a FACT, not an opinion.
JK
2007-11-24 19:56:19 UTC
Permalink
The Packers had a 45 point lead?
Who said they did? What they did have was a 34-12 lead with under 10
to go in the 4th qtr. Detroit pulled within 8. Some would say that
the Pack should have pulled their starter with a 22 pt lead and 10 min
to go.
You stupid shit. I guarantee you if we hadn't given up that TD, they
would have pulled Favre, but at the Packers' next offensive
opportunity it was only a 15 point lead, and 10 minutes is more than
enough time for a team to make up a 15 point deficit.
Hey Sparky, read this;
GB leading 27-0
3-5-MIN 17 (5:46) (Shotgun) 4-B.Favre pass deep left to 82-
R.Martin
for 17 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
You are a certified Moron and your guarantee is as worthless as your
opinions! You aren't even familiar with your own teams practices!
34-0 is a far cry from 56-10

Loading...