Discussion:
Galilean transformation equations [pointless rbwinn thread #5243534534]
(too old to reply)
rbwinn
2009-03-03 09:06:37 UTC
Permalink
[snip]
It does not concern me. �I am not even interested in it.
Robert B. Winn
Welcome to the thought process of Bobby.
Bobby is not interested in anything except generating noise, which is
why he started a new thread immediately after people stopped
responding to the last one. Just like many times before.
Given that Bobby isn't intelligent enough to just leave something
alone, he will most likely respond to this with something like 'thank
u for sharing', because he is too stupid to work through more than one
point at a time.
I would prefer that scientists just leave my posts alone. The fact
that they cannot do so confirms what I have always believed about
scientists.
Robert B. Winn
Sue...
2009-03-03 10:01:16 UTC
Permalink
[snip]
It does not concern me. I am not even interested in it.
Robert B. Winn
Welcome to the thought process of Bobby.
Bobby is not interested in anything except generating noise, which is
why he started a new thread immediately after people stopped
responding to the last one. Just like many times before.
Given that Bobby isn't intelligent enough to just leave something
alone, he will most likely respond to this with something like 'thank
u for sharing', because he is too stupid to work through more than one
point at a time.
I would prefer that scientists just leave my posts alone.  The fact
that they cannot do so confirms what I have always believed about
scientists.
Eric is not a scientist. He is a flunky that attacks
students trying to learn the material that he would
not study.


Sue...
Robert B. Winn
rbwinn
2009-03-03 23:06:09 UTC
Permalink
[snip]
It does not concern me. I am not even interested in it.
Robert B. Winn
Welcome to the thought process of Bobby.
Bobby is not interested in anything except generating noise, which is
why he started a new thread immediately after people stopped
responding to the last one. Just like many times before.
Given that Bobby isn't intelligent enough to just leave something
alone, he will most likely respond to this with something like 'thank
u for sharing', because he is too stupid to work through more than one
point at a time.
I would prefer that scientists just leave my posts alone. �The fact
that they cannot do so confirms what I have always believed about
scientists.
Robert B. Winn
Which neatly reinforces the point of view that Bobby thinks that by
engaging people he thinks to be scientists in conversation, he is
winning the longer he drags the conversation out.
Unfortunately Bobby is too stupid to understand that people like
myself greatly enjoy watching the puppet dance and make funny noises.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well, since you have nothing better to do, welcome to the group. So
are things slowing down for scientists with the economic crisis and
all?
Robert B. Winn
rbwinn
2009-03-05 03:32:56 UTC
Permalink
x'=x-vt
y'=y
z'=z
t'=t
Robert B. Winn
Yup. that's what they are.
How's the fishing going?
PD
The Galilean transformation equations do not have a length
contraction.
Robert B. Winn
Ah, the fishing isn't going as expected.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Maybe you would want to try somewhere else.
Robert B. Winn
Sue...
2009-03-05 05:37:02 UTC
Permalink
x'=x-vt
y'=y
z'=z
t'=t
Robert B. Winn
Yup. that's what they are.
How's the fishing going?
PD
The Galilean transformation equations do not have a length
contraction.
Robert B. Winn
Ah, the fishing isn't going as expected.
PD forgot where the fishin' hole is again.

Sue...
rbwinn
2009-03-09 09:29:14 UTC
Permalink
[snip stupidity]
Shut up, bobby. Go waste people's time somewhere else.
Someone who does not understand relativity does not tell me to shut
up, Eric. That just does not happen. How are you doing with the
velocity of S' relative to S in the Galilean transformation equations?
Robert B. Wi0nn

Loading...