k***@yahoo.com
2007-05-06 18:49:18 UTC
Are you stoned or just stupid?
"Stonenin", ha,ha,haTHE GALILEIAN COORDINATE SYSTEMS
Einstein to be somehow different with the Newton's definition of the
absolute coordinate system gave a new definition under the name
Galileian coordinate system. This definition is given in page 12 of
his book: Relativity". "A system of coordinates of which the state of
motion is such that the law of inertia holds relative to it is called
a Galileian system of coordinates. The laws of the mechanics of
Galilei-Newton can be regarded as valid only for a Galileian system of
coordinates".
1) Einstein practically doesn't say how we can determine that the law
of inertia holds in that system.
2) With the second sentence he practically excludes the validity of
Newton's laws in his General relativity where are valid al the laws of
nature. So results that the laws of the mechanics aren't valid for the
accelerated coordinate systems.
3) This means that the General relativity doesn't correspond for the
description of the motion of the material bodies.
4) By this can be concluded that the General relativity holds only for
the motion of the light and other phenomena of the nature.
5) This conclusion is supported and by the definition of genera
principle of the relativity in page 97 of his book: "All Gaussian
coordinate systems are essentially equivalent for the formulation of
the general laws of nature."
With this definition of the principle of the relativity is not
difficult to be seen that Einstein negates the Galilei's definition of
the principle of the relativity in spite of the fact that he says that
it is only a generalization. Is this confusion or is it a lie?
Because of what is said above and because of the big real differences
that exist between the scientists, it is recommendable to make a
division between Einstein and Newton and to say that Newton's theory
is valid for the description of the motion of the material bodies and
Einstein theory is valid for the description of the so called laws of
the nature. It is a good deal because is a correct share between
engineers and physicists.
5/05/007- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -Einstein to be somehow different with the Newton's definition of the
absolute coordinate system gave a new definition under the name
Galileian coordinate system. This definition is given in page 12 of
his book: Relativity". "A system of coordinates of which the state of
motion is such that the law of inertia holds relative to it is called
a Galileian system of coordinates. The laws of the mechanics of
Galilei-Newton can be regarded as valid only for a Galileian system of
coordinates".
1) Einstein practically doesn't say how we can determine that the law
of inertia holds in that system.
2) With the second sentence he practically excludes the validity of
Newton's laws in his General relativity where are valid al the laws of
nature. So results that the laws of the mechanics aren't valid for the
accelerated coordinate systems.
3) This means that the General relativity doesn't correspond for the
description of the motion of the material bodies.
4) By this can be concluded that the General relativity holds only for
the motion of the light and other phenomena of the nature.
5) This conclusion is supported and by the definition of genera
principle of the relativity in page 97 of his book: "All Gaussian
coordinate systems are essentially equivalent for the formulation of
the general laws of nature."
With this definition of the principle of the relativity is not
difficult to be seen that Einstein negates the Galilei's definition of
the principle of the relativity in spite of the fact that he says that
it is only a generalization. Is this confusion or is it a lie?
Because of what is said above and because of the big real differences
that exist between the scientists, it is recommendable to make a
division between Einstein and Newton and to say that Newton's theory
is valid for the description of the motion of the material bodies and
Einstein theory is valid for the description of the so called laws of
the nature. It is a good deal because is a correct share between
engineers and physicists.
5/05/007- Hide quoted text -