Dirk Van de moortel
2009-07-05 17:58:31 UTC
sink, sinking into an endless dark oblivion.
....
==================================
Correct, but coming from someone that thinks the Einstein Expansion
is called the "Lorentz contraction" and the Einstein time contraction
is called a "Lorentz transformation" when poor old Lorentz had
nothing to do with it, a four letter word is about your limit.
If anyone should get the credit for SR it is H.G. Wells.
.......
As their unsinkable became sinkable, Titanic named after the Greek
Titan Gods and the Gigantic named after the Greek Giants Gods both
sunk.
SANKTitan Gods and the Gigantic named after the Greek Giants Gods both
sunk.
==================================
Correct, but coming from someone that thinks the Einstein Expansion
is called the "Lorentz contraction" and the Einstein time contraction
is called a "Lorentz transformation" when poor old Lorentz had
nothing to do with it, a four letter word is about your limit.
If anyone should get the credit for SR it is H.G. Wells.
Androcles has a unique interpretation of Einstein's derivation of the
length of a moving object.
Androcles and I agree that the eqation
xi = gamma (x - vt)
is true
============================================
The hell it is. We'll only agree that the moron Einstein was its author,
but you continue to say Lorentz was. It certainly is NOT "true".
Lorentz wrote L = L0 * sqrt(1-v^2c^2) and that is called the "Lorentz
Contraction".
Einstein wrote xi = (x-vt) / sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) and that is the Einstein
Expansion.
Moron Bonehead cannot distinguish '*' from '/'.
End of fucking story, shithead.
xi = (x-vt) / sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
reduces to
x = xi * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
which means that Androfart doesn't know what the variables
represent :-)
Dirk Ddm