Aetherist
2011-10-05 21:49:58 UTC
[snip]
and always will.
REALLY?
So everything that obeys simple harmonic behavior has the same
physical basis?
A physical object like a spring has the same mathematical description
as that of a planet orbiting a star in a circular orbit. Does that
mean they are the same thing?
Think carefully before you say something stupider than usual.
Hanson was attempting to lead Draper towards this in this
thread. Oscillating mass...
Nice self immolation. Idiot.
Citing hanson as if he has anything worth listening to. Double idiot.
[snip rest, unread]
Yeah, right. You got caught blowing a smokes creen again...and unfamiliarity with physics that goes so deep that you
think any two different physical procesess that share the
same mathematical description are the 'same'.
Yes, mathematical form arrises from physical functionthink any two different physical procesess that share the
same mathematical description are the 'same'.
and always will.
So everything that obeys simple harmonic behavior has the same
physical basis?
A physical object like a spring has the same mathematical description
as that of a planet orbiting a star in a circular orbit. Does that
mean they are the same thing?
Think carefully before you say something stupider than usual.
thread. Oscillating mass...
Citing hanson as if he has anything worth listening to. Double idiot.
[snip rest, unread]
Turns out I don't really care what you think after all. Back to the
killfile.
Oh, that OK, this wasn't for you anyway. Your response was nothingkillfile.
but predictable. I'll make a prediction, Eric Gisse will not
contribute anything of substance to physics. He neither has
the capacity or tenacity for doing so, good riddance...