Discussion:
Relativity = Stupidity
(too old to reply)
s***@gmail.com
2008-10-07 16:53:38 UTC
Permalink
On Oct 7, 12:25 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel"
On Oct 7, 11:59 am, "Dirk Van de moortel"
You did not answer my question. The occurrence of event2 (tock)
occurs sometime after event1 (tick). Are you saying that the tock can
occur twice, one at 'standard' interval and another obe after a
'delayed' interval.
Events are events (either they take place or they do not). Time of
those events, however, are frame dependent, as have been shown and
discussed here for years.
For instance, if once a year you generate a light signal, for us its
rate will be exactly one light signal per year. For a space ship
traveling away at v = 0.5c the rate will be one light signal every two
years. This is even true in classical physics.
Yes, provided they can live with the fact that we define
time as what we read on our clocks.
They cannot live with that - they have decided that Time
Must Be Absolute. That is where all communiction stops.
Dirk Vdm
Yes, use all the clocks you want.  
You see, where all communication stops.
The question is, when does the tock
after the tick occur in clock M in frame M?  After 1 second, or more
than one second?
Imbecile.
[Let me re-emphasize we are talking of frame M.]
Yes, re-emphasize all you want.
Dirk Vdm- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
In conclusion, relativity is unable to provide an answer to a very
simple question. In this case, the 1 second question is:

When does the tock after the tick occur in clock M in frame M, after 1
second, or more than one second?


______________________________________________________
Discussion: If relativity cannot provide an answer to simple questions
as when the tock occurs after the tick, when we know for a fact that
it must occur, as it occurs in clocks and watches everyday all around
the world, how does it even pretend to provide answers to more complex
questions?
p***@hotmail.com
2008-10-08 16:03:21 UTC
Permalink
On 8 oct, 11:48, "Dirk Van de moortel"
I don't think I have ever seen a bigger idiot than you around here.
It is almost frightening how even Wilson and Spaceman make
more sense than you do.
Dirk Vdm
I propose that we all agree in that both Spaceman and Strich are
completely right, in relativity being wrong and stupid. That way their
egos will be satisfied and we could move to more interesting things,
like to convince Seto and others.

Miguel Rios

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...