Experiment in Light-Space-Time Travel - Next Generation Michelson-Morley Experiment

[Common World Inheritage Ambassador]

Hello
Nothing is wrong with SR

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
       Loading Image...
What kind of lunacy prompted Einstein to say
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
the "time" each way is the same?

We have to say that considering what we are used to saying how we
measure Distance and Time..as if they were orthogonal S-T Axis but it
is SR trying to show it is not. That is 1st order correction and then
comes GR with "Space-time" bent by Field of Mass/Energy.

I have hinted this when trying to assume Ether moves at 'v' in
"longitudnal" and not in "transverse" in MMX assumption.

What if the motion of "Pure" Space, without anyone except its Peer
Fields, is 3D and beyond and has.

If GR says Mass can bend Light, so means can Energy. So why Electric
Field and Magnetic Field would not bend light - but in the thread
David said there is no interaction. Yes there is no interaction
directly but through the Space. How does Mass bend light, not
directly but by bending Space-Time (which I believe is SR imported
term to show how S and T are interconnected and not Orthogonal but
here for understanding we can say Space only).

[Common World Inheritage Ambassador]

Hello
Nothing is wrong with SR

as far as our understanding and definition of Space and Time events as
linear and orthogonal - and SR tries to correct that with ST Co-
Ordinates which are basically not linear and not orthogonal...S and T
are interconnected...so it does take away intuition and bias from what
we are used to in Euclidean/Galleon/Newton Model.

Whole Physics is based on "man can measure"...tell him to count the
stars in sky and hair on his body...this has resulted in concepts like
Heisenberg Principles and we suffer from things like Wave Particle
Duality ..

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
       http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif
What kind of lunacy prompted Einstein to say
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
the "time" each way is the same?

I have hinted this when I mentioned about adding "earth's grosser
velocity", causing ether drag, to velocity of light in direction of
earth's motion, and this not affecting transverse velocity of light.

The whole ether is a nonsense concept understood as many things to
many people - like 5 blind touching an elephant and describing it..

How can one add "grosser" and near 1-D motion of rotation to "subtler"
component and with perhaps 3D or more than 3D motion?

We have Ice, Water and Steam in Rest...and pass through them say
Helium Gas in a complex 3D motion..where the 3D motion affects Ice,
Water and Steam in their 1D motions...will it be right to add 1D
vectors of these motions to the motion of Helium Gas in 3D, when the
motion is something we do not even comprehend and how it affects the
Point of Reference for the Ice, Water and Steam?

And when we do not find any difference in motions by some bending of
these motions to prove that there was no motion of Helium
substrate..I'm just taking a crude example to convey that Space is
something very Ethereal and fundamental that we understand till now..