Discussion:
The scientific method
(too old to reply)
gabydewilde
2008-12-21 13:35:53 UTC
Permalink
On Dec 21, 12:56 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel"
    opinion => consensus => truth
    money => opinion => consensus
The unified field theory becomes.
    money => opinion => consensus => truth
    money => truth
Hey will you look at that? Is that strange or whut?
[snip]
Hello doctor fundie!

I'm sorry for laughing about you but you are really that funny in the
way the unified field theory suggests.

Then again

science => progress

While

money => truth

is not progress. So, we may conclude this is not very scientific.

money => opinion => consensus => truth

Your kindergarten bully tactics aren't going to talk you out of this
one.

Back to square one for you (the Tee Vee)

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress
gabydewilde
2008-12-21 13:38:05 UTC
Permalink
On Dec 21, 12:56 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel"
[snip]
huh what?
gabydewilde
2008-12-21 17:30:40 UTC
Permalink
On Dec 21, 12:56 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel"
    opinion => consensus => truth
    money => opinion => consensus
The unified field theory becomes.
    money => opinion => consensus => truth
    money => truth
Hey will you look at that? Is that strange or whut?
No need to narrow it down.
     opinion => consensus => "gabydewilde is an imbecile"
And simplify with the business case to
     money => "gabydewilde is an imbecile"
It is just the way things work on this planet.
Nothing strange, so you better learn to live with it.
Dirk Vdm
*laughs*

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...