Discussion:
Train Gedanken Demonstrates Einstein's Incompetence and Dishonsty.
(too old to reply)
Absolutely Vertical
2013-05-16 16:01:59 UTC
Permalink
On May 15, 4:34 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel"
They clearly think that the purpose of the gedanken is to prove that
simultaneity is relative. It is not.
This reasoning does NOT prove "that simultaneity is relative".
It DOES neatly prove "that simultaneity is relative PROVIDED one
ASSUMES that lightspeed is constant for everyone in every direction".
No...your so call proof is based on the bogus assumption that relative
velocity will affect the isotropy of the speed of light in the train.
It does not.
Go have a dog piss against your leg or something,
whatever that makes a telephone pole happy.
kenseto's so stupid he cooks with old spice.
kenseto
2013-05-16 20:41:45 UTC
Permalink
On May 16, 11:06 am, "Dirk Van de moortel"
On May 15, 4:34 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel"
They clearly think that the purpose of the gedanken is to prove that
simultaneity is relative. It is not.
This reasoning does NOT prove "that simultaneity is relative".
It DOES neatly prove "that simultaneity is relative PROVIDED one
ASSUMES that lightspeed is constant for everyone in every direction".
No...your so call proof is based on the bogus assumption that relative
velocity will affect the isotropy of the speed of light in the train.
It does not.
Go have a dog piss against your leg or something,
whatever that makes a telephone pole happy.
ROTFLOL....so so counter arguement and you want to piss up your
legs....eh?
kenseto
2013-05-17 02:15:01 UTC
Permalink
On May 16, 11:06 am, "Dirk Van de moortel"
On May 15, 4:34 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel"
They clearly think that the purpose of the gedanken is to prove that
simultaneity is relative. It is not.
This reasoning does NOT prove "that simultaneity is relative".
It DOES neatly prove "that simultaneity is relative PROVIDED one
ASSUMES that lightspeed is constant for everyone in every direction".
No...your so call proof is based on the bogus assumption that relative
velocity will affect the isotropy of the speed of light in the train.
It does not.
Go have a dog piss against your leg or something,
whatever that makes a telephone pole happy.
Dirk Vdm
So your arguement is that you want to piss against your leg? You are a
fucking idiot.
kenseto
2013-05-17 03:32:24 UTC
Permalink
On May 16, 11:06 am, "Dirk Van de moortel"
On May 15, 4:34 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel"
They clearly think that the purpose of the gedanken is to prove that
simultaneity is relative. It is not.
This reasoning does NOT prove "that simultaneity is relative".
It DOES neatly prove "that simultaneity is relative PROVIDED one
ASSUMES that lightspeed is constant for everyone in every direction".
No...your so call proof is based on the bogus assumption that relative
velocity will affect the isotropy of the speed of light in the train.
It does not.
Go have a dog piss against your leg or something,
whatever that makes a telephone pole happy.
Dirk Vdm
your so call proof is based on the bogus assumption that relative
velocity will affect the isotropy of the speed of light in the train.
It does not.
So I suggest that you go piss against your leg near a telephone pole.
Loading...